THE county council’s executive agreed today to loan Nirah another £200,000 - just 20 per cent of the £1 million it had pledged in order to bring its contribution up to the same level as the East of England Development Agency with which it was supposed to be equal partner.
To be fair to the county, Nirah had pared its needs to the absolute bone and £200K is what it had asked for. But the county will have to pay half of the balance of £800,000 to EEDA to equalise their contribution.
Never mind. The two stars of the day were Connie Joy and her friend Eleanor Bishop, both 10 year-old pupils of the Alameda School, Ampthill, who had collected hundreds of signatures on the support Nirah petition. At the other end of the age spectrum was Mrs Harris, the pensioner whose offer of a £50 donation at the first support Nirah meeting sparked the ‘buy a brick’ campaign. That fund now stands at nearly £25,000, equivalent to the purchase of 500 bricks. It is still gathering interest in a solicitor’s client account and will not be used before the planning application goes in.
Connie and Eleanor and Mrs Harris presented the petition of 12,232 signatures which had been gained in just three months. And I know there are still petition forms out there which haven’t yet been handed in.
There was one wonderful moment of humour when Cllr Richard Stay referred to the firm of solicitors advising the council as Mills and Boon. He meant Mills and Reeves.
One of their solicitors was present through out the meeting until that item had been dealt with. I estimate his fees for the morning at more than £1,000 and he didn’t have to say a word, at least, not in public. I would like to bet that Mills and Reeves’ total bill for advice will be not much less than the amount of the loan to Nirah.
I was glad to hear Cllr Stay’s round condemnation of some of the unpleasant tactics used in trying to kill off Nirah. He said that if some of the innuendo used against the Nirah board had been used against him he would be consulting his lawyers by now. As it happens, I know lawyers are being consulted by Nirah, and not before time.
Council leader Madeline Russell let a cat out of the bag when she mentioned the threats by other commercial interests to take legal action against the council for supporting Nirah. She said that one of them was a company with leisure interests in the area. Now who, I wonder, could that be?
Before I close this item, I would like to thank some of the people who have fought for this cause for weeks on end, mostly without pay: in no particular order: my PA Phil Lotan, Jacquie Manners from Manners PR who, although she will be paid has put heart and soul into the fight, Jan Steel likewise, Ray Hostler and his partner Sue Hayhurst, Better Bedford Cllr Doug McMurdo and many, many more.
As I told the Look East television reporter after the money had been allocated, so many people were excited by the idea of Nirah, and the feeling of betrayal was massive when it looked as though Bedfordshire might lose the project for a comparatively small sum. That’s why more than 12,000 people signed the petition.
And that’s why they braved the aggressive and intimidating tactics of the ‘animal rights’ activists on Saturday when they were collecting more signatures. I am glad to say that many people signed deliberately to show their contempt for the ‘friends of fish’. Good for them. It made me proud.