SUNDAY - Today’s Remembrance Day service at the Embankmnt war memorial went off reasonable well today despite the fact that the actual order of service and the published order only randomly coincided which occasiuoned a good deal of head scratching and brow furrowing as people thumbed the leaflet trying to find out where they were. And the two minute silence was about doubled because the bugler who was to sounf the Last Post was out of eye-line with the parade marchal.
These things happen on live occasions. At least the weather remained dry.
There was a curious incident over the weekend. I was called on Friday by a reporter from the Mail-on-Sunday purporting to be interested in views I had expressed in my blog of a few days previously concerning the creation of a ‘remembrance season’. His questions seemed a bit vague and roundabout until he showed interest in how many councillors would be taking part in the parade.. Apparently somebody had phoned the newsdesk and said something about me banning it because there were not enough councillors attending.
I was mystified, although I knew the afternoon remembrance service at St Peter’s Church had been cancelled because the congregation had been getting smaller over the years, but that had nothing to do with me. He rang off saying there didn’t seem to be much to it.
I dismissed it from mind until later that evening when I discovered that the Mail on Sunday was trying to get a picture of me which indicated it still thought it had a story. Next morning my solicitor, Nic Davies, and I emailed a letter to the Mail on Sunday making it clear I had nothing to with the cancellation of the St Peters service and that I would not take kindly to any suggestion that I had stopped a commemoration of Remembrance Day.
There was nothing in MoS next morning so I assumed it had gone away, but after the parade I was accosted by a couple of chaps who said they were from the Daily Mail and had been sent along because they had heard the same story.
I pointed to the hundreds of people participating and they agreed that it didn’t look like I had cancelled the parafe. I told them again about the St Peter’s service and they said it sounded as though the two parades had been confused.
When I saw them later it was apparent that they had sought out the parade marshal who had told them that the borough in general and I in particular ‘could not have been more helpful to them’. So they went back to the Daily Mail offices in Kensington without a story but a couple of free cups of coffee leaving me wondering who had gone to so much trouble to pass on this dud tip without even an elementary checking of the facts.