Inquest mystery partially solved

I am pleased to have discovered the root of the failure to notify the media of the inquest on David Ledsom.

It took place in March, you may recall, and there was no report of the proceedings until May after I had idly asked BoS editor Steve Lowe when it would take place. That enquiry yielded a sketchy report in the following week’s paper and the revelation that, despite having made their perfectly legitimate interest clear, the usual sources had not informed the media of the date of the inquest.

I have been plugging away at this mystery, fearing that it was another step down the ladder of news censorship.

Which it may have been, but not caused by coroner David Morris, nor Dave Ledsom’s widow Lesley, who between them had taken steps to deal with what they had assumed would be major media interest. They even delayed the start of the inquest when no media arrived assuming the wrong time had been given.

It seems that the coroner had followed his normal practice of passing date and time on to the police who had passed it on to the press office which, if normal procedure had been followed, would have passed it on to the media. But it didn’t.

Chief press officer Jo Hobbs, a former BoS journalist, said it was an error and added defensively that it was not the press office’s duty to pass date of inquests to the media, which begs two questions: one, whose duty was it? and, two, what information did the press office consider it their duty to pass on? Remember those jokes about the shortest books in the world? I suspect that one would be a front-runner.

So most of the mystery is solved. The coroner did what he could to meet legitimate media needs. The remaining question is what else was going on in the press office to make the most important inquest in years so forgettable?

Having got this far I will now drop the issue in deference to the pain Lesley has suffered and is no doubt still suffering. I would have preferred not to have gone down this road but in an age where every jack-or-jacquie-in-office tries to control information to the public I think it important to resist where one can.

2 Responses to “Inquest mystery partially solved”

  1. James Jacobs Says:

    Frank, in this day and age, it would not be unreasonable to expect the Cororner’s Office to post the relevant details on a website - making such information easily accessible, without the public’s need to have information filtered to it via the media or local press.

    Maybe this is something they may consider doing in the future? It would also be easy to access for the local media too.

    Either, way I understand why you feel it necessary not to pursue the matter any further though, in the interests of the bereaved.

  2. mayor Says:

    Good point. I will suggest it to the media.